The effect of three-type Vortex Generators (VGs) on NACA-0015 hydrofoil cavitation formation at different angles of attack
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract:
Cavitation, the formation of vapor bubbles on hydrofoil surfaces, poses a significant challenge to the performance and durability of marine vessels utilizing hydrofoils. Vortex generators, small structures embedded on the hydrofoil surface, have emerged as a potential solution for mitigating cavitation, but the optimal shape of vortex generators for achieving maximum cavitation resistance remains an open question. This study aims to address this challenge by systematically investigating the impact of rectangular, triangular, and circular vortex generators on the cavitation characteristics of a NACA-0015 hydrofoil. Utilizing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, the influence of these vortex generator shapes on cavitation inception and critical cavitation numbers will be evaluated under varying angles of attack and flow velocities. The findings of this study will provide valuable insights into the design and optimization of vortex generators for hydrofoil applications. Despite the effectiveness of vortex generators in mitigating cavitation, the optimal vortex generator shape for specific hydrofoil designs and operating conditions remains unclear. The precise mechanisms by which vortex generators suppress cavitation are not fully understood, requiring further investigation to optimize their design and placement. The durability and long-term performance of vortex generators under various environmental conditions, including turbulence and corrosion, warrant further evaluation. By addressing these unsolved challenges, this study will contribute to the advancement of vortex generator technology and its practical application in hydrofoil systems, leading to more efficient and reliable marine vessels.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2023 Farajollahi A
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.
We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.
Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]
Explanation
'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.
Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.
With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:
|
License Name |
Permission to read and download |
Permission to display in a repository |
Permission to translate |
Commercial uses of manuscript |
|
CC BY 4.0 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.
Franc JP, Michel JM. Attached cavitation and the boundary layer: experimental investigation and numerical treatment. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1985; 154: 63-90.
Kjeldsen M, Arndt REA, Effertz M.Spectral Characteristics of Sheet/Cloud Cavitation. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 2000; 122(3): 481-487.
Adama Maiga M, Coutier-Delgosha O, Buisine D. A new cavitation model based on bubble-bubble interactions. Physics of Fluids. 2018; 30(12).
Kannan YS, Karri B, Sahu KC. Letter: Entrapment and interaction of an air bubble with an oscillating cavitation bubble. Physics of Fluids. 2018; 30(4).
Chen L. Influence of water quality on the tip vortex cavitation inception. Physics of Fluids. 2019; 31(2).
Foeth EJ, van Terwisga T, van Doorne C. On the Collapse Structure of an Attached Cavity on a Three-Dimensional Hydrofoil. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 2008; 130(7).
Teran LA. Interaction of particles with a cavitation bubble near a solid wall. Physics of Fluids. 2018; 30(12).
Leger AT, Ceccio SL. Examination of the flow near the leading edge of attached cavitation. Part 1. Detachment of two-dimensional and axisymmetric cavities. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1998; 376: 61-90.
Leger AT, Bernal LP, Ceccio SL. Examination of the flow near the leading edge of attached cavitation. Part 2. Incipient breakdown of two-dimensional and axisymmetric cavities. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1998; 376: 91-113.
Arakeri VH, Acosta AJ. Viscous Effects in the Inception of Cavitation on Axisymmetric Bodies. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 1973; 95(4): 519-527.
Rood EP. Review—Mechanisms of Cavitation Inception. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 1991; 113(2): 163-175.
Churkin SA. Cavitation on NACA0015 hydrofoils with different wall roughness: high-speed visualization of the surface texture effects. Journal of Visualization. 2016; 19(4): 587-590.
Ezzatneshan E. Study of surface wettability effect on cavitation inception by implementation of the lattice Boltzmann method. Physics of Fluids. 2017; 29(11).
Arakeri VH. Viscous effects on the position of cavitation separation from smooth bodies. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 1975; 68(4): 779-799.
Goto A, Zangeneh M. Hydrodynamic Design of Pump Diffuser Using Inverse Design Method and CFD. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 2002; 124(2): 319-328.
Zangeneh M. A compressible three-dimensional design method for radial and mixed flow turbomachinery blades. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids. 1991; 13(5): 599-624.
Zhu B, Chen H. Analysis of the Staggered and Fixed Cavitation Phenomenon Observed in Centrifugal Pumps Employing a Gap Drainage Impeller. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 2017; 139(3).
Kato H. Suppression of Sheet Cavitation Inception by Water Discharge through Slit. Journal of Fluids Engineering. 1987; 109(1): 70-74.
Jin W. Cavitation generation and inhibition. I. Dominant mechanism of turbulent kinetic energy for cavitation evolution. AIP Advances. 2021; 11(6).
Shi W. Cavitation observations and noise measurements of horizontal axis tidal turbines with biomimetic blade leading-edge designs. Ocean Engineering. 2016; 121: 143-155.
Lu F. Application of the vortex generator to control the PHV cavitation. Journal of Ship Mechanics. 2009; 13(6): 873-879.
Sun T. Evaluation of effect of micro-vortex generator on dynamic characteristics of unsteady partial cavitating flow over hydrofoil. Ocean Engineering. 2022; 257: 111601.
Lu F. Application of the vortex generator to control the PHV cavitation. 2009; 13: 873-879.
Kadivar E. An experimental investigation of transient cavitation control on a hydrofoil using hemispherical vortex generators. Journal of Hydrodynamics. 2021; 33(6): 1139-1147.
Qiu N. Effects of microvortex generators on cavitation erosion by changing periodic shedding into new structures. Physics of Fluids. 2020; 32(10).
Che B. Control effect of micro vortex generators on leading edge of attached cavitation. Physics of Fluids. 2019; 31(4).