The SIMUS method addresses two important MCDM drawbacks: Getting different results for the same problem, and the inability to model complex scenarios
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper considers that actual methods for addressing MODM or MCDM scenarios share two shortcomings along these lines: a) Failing to show equal results when different MCDM methods solve the same problem. b) Inability to replicate actual scenarios, by not taking into account existing conditions, and thus, producing an approximate representation of reality, which obviously, renders not reliable results. This paper shows how the SIMUS method addresses these two shortcomings.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2022 Munier N.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Munier N (2011) A Strategy for Using Multicriteria Analysis in Decision-Making: A Guide for Simple and complex Environmental Projects. Springer. USA. Link: https://bit.ly/3In3Ts7
Munier N (2011b) Procedimiento fundamentado en la Programación Lineal para la selección de alternativas en proyectos de naturaleza compleja y con objetivos múltiples- Universidad Politécnica de Valencia – España. Link: Link: https://bit.ly/3N02Od4
Kantorovich L (1939). Link: https://bit.ly/3wiafq9
Antucheviciene J, Zavadskas E, Zakarevicius A (2010) Ranking of construction management alternatives considering criteria interrelations. The 10th International Conference – Vilnius – Lithuania 351–355. Link: https://bit.ly/3tiLl86
Peniwati K (2007) Criteria for evaluating group decision-making methods. Mathematical and Computer Methoding 46: 935-947. Link: https://bit.ly/3iisX8U
Dantzig G (1948) Linear Programming and extensions. United States Air Force. Link: https://bit.ly/3KXrIbp
Frontline Systems. Create, Deploy and Manage Analytics for Better Decisions in Azure, Power Platform, Excel. Link: https://bit.ly/3IkjpF5
Lliso P (2014) Multicriteria Decision-Making by Simus.