Evaluating the Effectiveness of Reasoned-action Theories (TRA, TPB, IBM) for Explaining Low E-commerce Adoption in a Developing Country: A Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) approach
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper explains the process of e-commerce adoption through reasoned action theories (theory of reasoned action (TRA), theory of planned behavior (TPB), and integrated behavioral model (IBM)) in a developing country. Owing to a lack of precedent in the study settings, the study first validated empirical scales for measuring psychosocial drivers of behavior using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Subsequently, the study validated the aforementioned models using structural equation modeling, and also integrated sociodemographic characteristics as precursor variables in the model with the greatest predictive power. Results depicted that while TRA and TPB explain behavior well, it is IBM that is the most effective in explaining online consumer behavior, and underlined the importance of using volitional, sociodemographic, and individual-level factors (knowledge of e-commerce and environmental constraints to use e-commerce) to explain online consumer behavior. The study has numerous implications for e-commerce vendors operating in developing countries as the validated scales and models can be used to assess individual perceptions regarding e-commerce and to design effective communication strategies, respectively.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2022 Siddiqui JR.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.
We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.
Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]
Explanation
'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.
Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.
With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:
|
License Name |
Permission to read and download |
Permission to display in a repository |
Permission to translate |
Commercial uses of manuscript |
|
CC BY 4.0 |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.
Pavlou, Fygenson. Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior. MIS Quarterly, 2006; 30(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148720
Gefen Karahanna, Straub. Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 2003; 27(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
Ba S, Pavlou PA. Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior. MIS Quarterly, 2002; 26(3), 243. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132332
Clark EM. Explaining planned behavior and reasoned action. PsycCRITIQUES, 2010; 55(31). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019191
Khan H. A Report on eCommerce Trends in Pakistan. Karachi: Kaymu. 2016.
Nielsen. Global Trends in Online Shopping - A Nielsen Global Consumer Report. Nielsen. 2010.
Ajzen I, Fishbein M. The prediction of behavioral intentions in a choice situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1969; 5(4), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(69)90033-X
Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. (Eds.). Health behavior: theory, research and practice (Fifth edition). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 2015.
Jahoda M, Fishbein M. Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement. The British Journal Of Sociology, 1968; 19(2).
Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. 1980.
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991; 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Sheppard BH, Hartwick J, Warshaw PR. The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 1988; 15(3), 325. https://doi.org/10.1086/209170
Koufaris M. Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior. Information Systems Research. 2002; 13(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83
Lim H, Dubinsky AJ. The theory of planned behavior in e-commerce: Making a case for interdependencies between salient beliefs. Psychology and Marketing. 2005; 22(10), 833–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20086
Mathieson K. Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research. 1991; 2(3), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.173
Kasprzyk D, Montano DE, Fishbein M. Application of an Integrated Behavioral Model to Predict Condom Use: A Prospective Study Among High HIV Risk Groups1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1998; 28(17), 1557–1583. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01690.x
Jaccard J, Dodge T, Dittus P. Parent-adolescent communication about sex and birth control: a conceptual framework. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2002 Fall;(97):9-41. doi: 10.1002/cd.48. PMID: 14964942.
Triandis HC. Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. Nebr Symp Motiv. 1980;27:195-259. PMID: 7242748.
Fishbein M, Ajzen I, Albarracin D, Hornik R. Reasoned Action Approach: Some Issues, Questions, and Clarifications. In Prediction and change of health behavior: Applying the reasoned action approach 2007 ; 281–295. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;40(Pt 4):471-99. doi: 10.1348/014466601164939. PMID: 11795063.
Chang M. Predicting Unethical Behavior: A Comparison of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior, 1998; 17(16), 1825–1834.
Han H, Hsu L.-T. (Jane), Sheu C. Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to green hotel choice: Testing the effect of environmentally friendly activities. Tourism Management, 2010; 31(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.03.013
Lee M. Effects of attitude and destination image on association members’ meeting participation intentions: development of meeting participation model (Ph. D). Kansas State University, Kansas. 2005.
Park J. Understanding consumer intention to shop online (Ph. D). University of Missouri, Missouri. 2003.
Ryu K, Jang S. (Shawn). Intention to Experience Local Cuisine in a Travel Destination: The Modified Theory of Reasoned Action. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research. 2006; 30(4), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348006287163
Vallerand RJ, Deshaies P, Cuerrier J-P, Pelletier LG, et al. Ajzen and Fishbein’s theory of reasoned action as applied to moral behavior: A confirmatory analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1992; 62(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.62.1.98
Hernandez M, Iyengar SS. What Drives Whom? A Cultural Perspective on Human Agency. Social Cognition, 2001; 19(3), 269–294. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.19.3.269.21468
Bandura A. Toward a Psychology of Human Agency. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;1(2):164-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x. PMID: 26151469.
Hennessy M, Bleakley A, Fishbein M, Brown L, Diclemente R, Romer D, Valois R, Vanable PA, Carey MP, Salazar L. Differentiating between precursor and control variables when analyzing reasoned action theories. AIDS Behav. 2010 Feb;14(1):225-36. doi: 10.1007/s10461-009-9560-z. Epub 2009 Apr 16. PMID: 19370408; PMCID: PMC2819107.
Ajzen I. Constructing a TPB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations. Working Paper, Amherst: University of Massachusetts. 2002.
Grimm LG, Yarnold PR. (Eds.). Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (1st ed). Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association. 1995.
Gugiu PC, Coryn C, Clark R, Kuehn A. Development and evaluation of the short version of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care instrument. Chronic Illn. 2009 Dec;5(4):268-76. doi: 10.1177/1742395309348072. Epub 2009 Nov 19. PMID: 19933249.
DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications (3. ed). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publ. 2012.
Kaiser HF. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1958; 23(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289233
Kline R. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. 2010.
Gugiu C, Coryn CL, Applegate B. Structure and measurement properties of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care instrument. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Jun;16(3):509-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01151.x. Epub 2010 Feb 22. PMID: 20210824.
Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981; 18(3), 382. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
Gadermann AM, Guhn M, Zumbo BD. Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2012; 17(3), 1–12.
Hancock G, Muelle, R. Rethinking construct reliability with latent variable systems. In Structural Equation Modelling: Present and Future 2001; 195–216.
DeVon HA, Block ME, Moyle-Wright P, Ernst DM, Hayden SJ, Lazzara DJ, Savoy SM, Kostas-Polston E. A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2007;39(2):155-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x. PMID: 17535316.
Lu C. Assessing Construct Validity: The Utility of Factor Analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement and Statistics. 2006; 15(2), 79–94.
Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. 2005; 10(7), 1–9.
Stevens J. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Mahwah, N.J: L. Erlbaum. 2002.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed). New York: Academic Press. 1977.
Selya AS, Rose JS, Dierker LC, Hedeker D, Mermelstein RJ. A Practical Guide to Calculating Cohen's f(2), a Measure of Local Effect Size, from PROC MIXED. Front Psychol. 2012 Apr 17;3:111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00111. PMID: 22529829; PMCID: PMC3328081.
Van den Putte B. 20 years of the theory of reasoned action of Fishbein and Ajzen: A meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Amsterdam. 1991.
Venkatesh Morris Davis, Davis. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 2003; 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh V, Thong J, Xu X. Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 2012; 36(1), 157–178.