Exploring the user’s preferences of different adaptation policies in adaptive menu design

Main Article Content

Prashant Poudel*
Sushil Shrestha

Abstract

Adaptive User Interfaces (AUIs) have been developed to improve the usability of products by adapting to the user, the platform, and the environment. However, there is a limited understanding of how different adaptation policies impact personalization and usability in adaptive menus. The present study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of different adaptation policies in adaptive menu design. The study surveyed computer science students at Kathmandu University and conducted a usability study to gather data. The results of the study showed that a majority of participants were neutral in their perception of the ease of use of the websites they regularly visit, but a strong majority (83%) indicated a preference for personalized menu options. Personalization was found to be a key factor in the effectiveness of adaptive menus. Participants valued the ability of adaptive menus to tailor their options based on their specific needs or preferences. The findings of this study provide insight into users’ preferences for adaptation policies in adaptive menus and suggest that a recency-frequency-based menu is most effective in meeting users’ needs. Similarly, findings also suggest users’ preference for adaptation policy also changes based on the context of use. Future research could further investigate the effectiveness of different adaptation policies in different contexts of use.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Poudel, P., & Shrestha, S. (2023). Exploring the user’s preferences of different adaptation policies in adaptive menu design. Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology, 8(1), 005–011. https://doi.org/10.17352/tcsit.000062
Research Articles

Copyright (c) 2023 Poudel P, et al.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Licensing and protecting the author rights is the central aim and core of the publishing business. Peertechz dedicates itself in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. Peertechz licensing terms are formulated to facilitate reuse of the manuscripts published in journals to take maximum advantage of Open Access publication and for the purpose of disseminating knowledge.

We support 'libre' open access, which defines Open Access in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage rights. The usage rights are granted through the use of specific Creative Commons license.

Peertechz accomplice with- [CC BY 4.0]

Explanation

'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.

Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.

With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with Peertechz, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
'CC BY' license observance:

License Name

Permission to read and download

Permission to display in a repository

Permission to translate

Commercial uses of manuscript

CC BY 4.0

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

The authors please note that Creative Commons license is focused on making creative works available for discovery and reuse. Creative Commons licenses provide an alternative to standard copyrights, allowing authors to specify ways that their works can be used without having to grant permission for each individual request. Others who want to reserve all of their rights under copyright law should not use CC licenses.

Hartmann M. Challenges in Developing User-Adaptive Intelligent User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 17th Workshop on Adaptivity and User Modeling in Interactive Systems. 2009.

Gonçalves T, Rocha A. The development process for intelligent user interfaces: an initial approach. In Proceedings of the XVIII Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality. 2019; 210-215.

Gajos KZ, Czerwinski M, Tan DS, Weld DS. Exploring the design space for adaptive graphical user interfaces. In Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces. New York, NY: ACM. 2006; 201–208.

Ehlert PA. Intelligent user interfaces: Introduction and survey. The Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands. 2003.

Nielsen J, Tahir M. Homepage usability: 50 websites deconstructed. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders. 2002.

Morville P, Rosenfeld L. Information architecture for the world wide web (3rd ed). Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media. 2006.

Kolski C, Le Strugeon E. A review of intelligent human-machine interfaces in the light of the arch model. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 1998; 10(3): 193-231.

Sears A, Shneiderman B. Split menus: Effectively using selection frequency to organize menus. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 1994; 1(1): 27-51.

Findlater L, McGrenere J. A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vienna, Austria. 2004; 89–96.

Findlater L, Mcgrenere J. Impact of screen size on performance, awareness, and user satisfaction with adaptive graphical user interfaces. In Proceeding of the Twenty-sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM. 2008; 1247–1256.

Tsandilas T, Schraefel MC. An empirical assessment of adaptation techniques. CHI ’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA. 2005; 2009–2012.

Gajos KZ, Everitt K, Tan DS, Czerwinski M, Weld DS. Predictability and accuracy in adaptive user interfaces. In Proceeding of the Twenty-sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM. 2008; 1271–1274.

Kleiss JA. Identifying users’ conceptual organization of menu functions in an automotive electronic navigation product. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting, 1997; 944-948.

Bouzit S, Vanderdonckt J, Calvary G, Chêne D. Cloud Menus, a circular adaptive menu for small screens. IUI, AMC, 2018; 7-11.

Antwarg L, Lavie T, Shapira B, Rokach L, Meyer J. Highlighting items as means of adaptive assistance. Behavior & Information Technology. 2013; 32(8): 761–777.

Liu W, Bailly G, Howes A. Effects of frequency distribution on linear menu performance. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. 2017; 1307-1312.

Tanvir E, Cullen J, Irani P, Cockburn A. AAMU: adaptive activation area menus for improving selection in cascading pull-down menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. 2008;1381-1384.

Vanderdonckt J, Bouzit S, Calvary G, Chêne D. Exploring a design space of graphical adaptive menus: Normal vs. small screens. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems. 2019; 10:1-4.

Findlater L, Moffatt K, McGrenere J, Dawson J. Ephemeral adaptation: The use of gradual onset to improve menu selection performance. In CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM. 2009; 1655-1664.

Gobert C, Todi K, Bailly G, Oulasvirta A. SAM: A Modular Framework for Self-Adapting Web Menus. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 2019; 481-484.

Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1993.

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006; 3(2): 77-101.

Most read articles by the same author(s)